cons civilization

Cons: 

Exaggeration

The scientists want to feel proud of their country and past. This makes them exaggerate what they see. You need to find cities to say that there was a Civilization. I believe, what scientists are finding are villages  not cities. When they excavate they see many potteries in close distances  and they immediately think it was city. Lot of primitive people living together doesn't make a city. I believe they were villages.       

Inaccurate Scientific methods
They also saw buildings which indicate that there were cities. They used scientific tools to date the buildings. The age came out to be 3000 years ago. I think these buildings are more recent like 1000 years ago. I believe measurements have big range of inaccuracy. Scientists are relying too much on these faulty tools. 

Ġgantija		Malta	Europe	3700 BC	Temple	Two structures on the island of Gozo. The second was built four centuries after the oldest.[13][14]
West Kennet Long Barrow		England	Europe	3650 BC	Tomb	Located near Silbury Hill and Avebury stone circle.[15]
Listoghil		Ireland	Europe	3550 BC	Passage Tomb	At the centre of the Carrowmore passage tomb cluster, a simple box-shaped chamber is surrounded by a kerb c.34m in diameter and partly covered by a cairn. It has been partly reconstructed.[16]
Pentre Ifan		Wales	Europe	3500 BC	Neolithic Dolmen	It contains and gives its name to the largest and best preserved neolithic dolmen in Wales. One of the oldest and best preserved Neolithic dolmen in the United Kingdom.
Sechin Bajo		Peru	South America	3500 BC	Plaza	The oldest known building in the Americas.[17]
La Hougue Bie		Jersey	Europe	3500 BC	Passage grave	An 18.6 metre long passage chamber. The chapel above is medieval.[18]
						.